Fifth EditionFifth Edition Cover GPNG

Global Policy: Next Generation is an annual issue from Global Policy and is funded by the Global Policy Institute. The Institute is hosted in the School of Government and International Affairs and is a joint venture with the Durham Law School. This multi-disciplinary, peer-reviewed publication provides a platform for graduate and early career researchers to publish research on-par with the most rigorous of academic journals. We seek out the next generation of groundbreaking research in global policymaking and broaden horizons in terms of both content and authorship.

Picking up where the last issue left off, articles in the fifth issue of Global Policy: Next Generation tackle the management and decision-making processes of crises by global governance structures. They unpack potential paths and solutions to pressing issues in an attempt to not only attest to the global disorder in which we live but also to identify valid exit strategies from what is more and more described as a political stalemate. 

 

 


Editorial

Editorial - Flavia Lucenti, Thomas McWilliam, Maren Vieluf and Gregory Stiles

Research Articles

Unique data, different values: Explaining variation in the use of biometrics by international humanitarian organizations - Çağlar Açıkyıldız

Epistemic competition in global governance: The case of pharmaceutical patents - Cynthia Couette

‘No safe haven’: Why the GATT ‘regional exception’ does not apply to technical barriers to trade - Silvia Nuzzo

Climate policy at the International Monetary Fund: No voice for the vulnerable? - Lara Merling and Timon Forster

 

 


Read also:

Fourth Edition

Third Edition

Second Edition

First Edition

 

The Implications of Inconsistent Content Moderation: Reflections on Ukraine and Yemen Conflicts

pexels-anthony-beck-4493205.jpg

 

 

 

 

Caroline Tynan argues that online platforms must adhere to and carefully balance international human rights law to tackle online hate and extremism during conflicts.

Over the last several years, human rights organizations have noted with alarm the problem of automated removal of extremist content. Not only have these policies lacked transparency and been used against journalists and activists, but they have also removed evidence of war crimes.  (Continued...)

 

 

 

*